|
![]() |
|
|
![]()
At the age of 18 Edna Millay wrote a magnificent poem, Renascence. In it, she fantasizes an experience of "leaving the body," to partake of Infinity, God, Nature, etc. Following are 5 excerpts from this poem, out of context certainly, but the use I shall make of them will do no injustice to the poem as a whole.
Now I shall make four citations from one of her biographers (Joan Dash, "A life of One's Own," Harper & Row, 1973).
I now invite your attention to of her handwriting, with which I will make some correlations to both the references from the poem and Dash's book (34). Read again citations 2, 4, and 5, and then note the "flatness" of the middle zone of her script. There is much thread there, showing that she felt "pressed" down from both sides of life the material and the ideational (spiritual). When the thread is relieved by letter-forms, they are very small and clogged with ink, a sign of great sensuousness, averred by the last phrase of citation 9. Note the high-flying upward-tending t-bars, signs of vital awareness of "Infinity" or the ideational. At the same time, consider the intense pressure of the lower zone downstrokes. Here are seen signs of a fundamental conflict in her nature great material desires, and an almost ethereal sense of the abstract. Is it any wonder, with this conflict, that she had a constant headache for over a year (citation 7), and was death-haunted and claustrophobic (citation 9), which, along with other implied nervous system disorders, led to a nervous breakdown (citation 8)? Despite the generally good arrangement of the script there are nice wide spaces between lines the lower zone with its driving, almost demonic force, invades the upper zone of the lower lines, indicating primacy of her "animal" over her "spiritual" nature. She was thus under a very strong, ubiquitous tug-of-war between these two fundamentally different sides of life. An evaluation of guilt feelings can thus be made from this aspect of her script, to which she testifies in her own words (citation 3); she felt responsible for the sins of the whole world! But the final stroke(s), literally as well as figuratively, is seen in those violent heavy back-slashes 4 of them, in this short script. That 2 of them are in her signature is particularly revealing. It is as if she were trying to blot out her existence, screaming for death or dissolution, as citation 6 puts it. That she wanted to die by drowning, specifically, is not of course, revealed by the handwriting, but this wish takes on new significance in light of her script. Since she feels inextricably "bounded" (citation 1) by land, corresponding to the graphic "boundedness" that has been mentioned, the sea is a fitting place to bring about the desired oblivion. Also, the "empty expanse" of the wide interline spaces, in which the t-bars are "immersed," represent her aim of escaping the domination of practical existence, seen in the flattened middle zone. This is particularly true of the backward strokes which jut up via great spurts of energy from life on this "plane" to absorption in that "sea," signs of vehement and impetuous suicidal tendencies. Finally, she warns all whose "souls" are "flat," like hers, that the "sky will cave in on" them, as it did on her (citation 5)! So here we see, that as in Specs. 59-61,(other "neurotic specimens in the book from which this article is taken) neurosis takes different forms, but is always the result of an imbalance in one's psyche between the sympathetic and the parasympathetic nervous systems, (and matter- and spaces- binding, connotation I and connotation II, two previous themes of my book), etc. which is unavoidably connected with whatever shades of psychosis one's life-view has. And all life-views have some, for it is impossible to perceive and/or conceive "true reality"; reality is "parcelled out" to us by "Nature," and partly created by us, via the only receptors and reactors we have, our nervous systems (including our brains), with all their limitations, to say nothing of the fact that the nature of the observed is always changed to some degree by the observer.
Guest Analyst: Rex Smith, Phd,
|